Scholarly Mode

The writing partner that won’t fabricate your citations.

Scholarly Mode audits every source against the claim it supports — and meets your research wherever it already is.

No fabricated citations 7-database verification Per-claim evidence quotes
citation auditor
Your claim
“Spaced repetition improves long-term retention compared with massed study.”
Roediger & Karpicke (2006), Psychological Science.
Resolving the reference
Checking the source exists across scholarly databases…
CrossRefOpenAlexPubMed arXivOpenLibraryHandleARK
Reading the source · matching to your claim
“…retention was markedly higher after repeated testing than after repeated study…”
passage located · comparing against your sentence
Verdict
SUPPORTED
“…retention was markedly higher after repeated testing than after repeated study…”
resolved via CrossRef · not retracted · evidence quote shown

The pipeline

One pipeline. Get on and off anywhere.

Every research workflow is a slice of the same line. Pick where you start — Juno lights up only the part you need, and verifies every source along the way.

Where are you starting? — I have…
Ideation Idea Agent
Ideation built
Turn a topic into a direction. The Coordinator routes to the Idea Agent to brainstorm scope and angle.
Coordinator · Idea Agent
Research 7 resolvers
Research built
Gather literature and build a store of real, resolved sources — with retraction detection. Gaps are marked, never fabricated.
Research Agent · Deep Research
Organize List · Map · Matrix
Organize built
Triage what you found across List, Map, and Matrix views — separate used from background, tag and filter, see how sources relate, and synthesize across them.
Research Workspace
Outlining IMRAD partial
Outlining partial
Choose a paper type and section skeleton. IMRAD enforces per-section word budgets and required-section checks.
Outline Agent · Paper (IMRAD) · Monograph
Drafting 14 agents
Drafting built
Write with the 14-agent team. Citations are inserted inline; unsupported statements get a [CITATION NEEDED] flag instead of a made-up source.
Writer Agent + team
Cite & Audit Auditor
Cite & Audit built
Verify each reference resolves and that the source actually supports the adjacent claim — with the exact evidence quote. Conservative by design.
Citation Auditor
Peer Review Personas
Peer Review built
Stress-test before a human reviewer does: configurable reviewer personas + a rubric → reviewer reports and an Editor’s Decision.
Simulated Peer Review · Debater
Format citeproc
Format built
Apply citation style and document structure — APA 7, MLA, Chicago, IEEE, Vancouver.
citeproc rendering
Export DOCX
Export built
Leave with a submission-grade artifact: DOCX with a real, formatted bibliography.
DOCX + bibliography
↻ repeats across chapters · one shared research base
Zotero rail your research manager runs alongside the spine — not a stage ResearchOrganizeExport
Pick a path ← the timeline lights up only the part you’d use
Enters at —
You leave with
See how →
Six ways in

Whatever you brought, there’s a path.

Each journey is one entry and one exit on the same pipeline. Open any of them in the workspace.

Write from scratch

The full pipeline, end to end — Ideation through Export with the 14-agent team beside you.

submission-grade paper
See how →

Build a body of work

A Monograph (chapters) or Collection (papers) sharing one research base — the from-scratch path on a loop.

coherent monograph or collection
See how →

Audit existing work the wedge

Import a finished draft; the Citation Auditor verifies each source against the claim it supports.

audit report — verdicts + evidence quotes
See how →

Drive research

Research Agent + Deep Research + 7 resolvers. Gaps are marked, never invented.

verified research base
See how →

Connect a research manager

Zotero feeds the line and receives from it. Push today; import as a reading base is coming.

library ↔ draft in sync
See how →

Finish an in-progress paper

Jump on mid-draft and ride drafting → audit → format → submission.

finished from a partial draft
See how →
The rigor moat

Most AI invents references. Juno verifies them — and shows its work.

Drop in a draft and the Citation Auditor reads each source, then tells you whether it actually supports your sentence. Verdicts stay conservative on purpose.

Citation Auditor sample verdict
Claim in your draft
“Microplastics from bottled water cross the human blood–brain barrier.”
Source you cited
Nguyen et al. (2023), Environ. Sci. Technol. resolved not retracted
Evidence the auditor read
“…translocation was observed in murine models; human data remain unavailable.”
PARTIAL The source supports translocation in mice — not the human claim. Juno biases toward “unverifiable” over a false “supported.”

Verdicts: supported · partial · unverifiable · contradicted.

The honest citation workflow

…and data-sharing mandates accelerated sharply after 2020 [CITATION NEEDED], reshaping how labs publish.

The team flags the gap instead of inventing a source. The Citation Auditor later resolves it into a verified reference — or a visible “unverifiable.”

Most AIFabricates a plausible-looking citation to fill the gap.
JunoFlags the gap, then verifies whatever you cite to close it.
See citation linking in action
Aggregate
Rigor score coming

A single number that rolls up every verdict across the paper — labeled as roadmap, not claimed today.

Fits your workflow

Juno sits between your library and your submission.

It doesn’t replace either — it connects them, and keeps every source accountable in between.

Your library · inputs
Zotero push import soon
Send cited sources back to your library today; bidirectional import as a reading base is coming.
PDF ingestion
A pile of papers becomes resolvable, citable research.
Dynamic Juno
Juno
Scholarly Mode
Your submission · outputs
DOCX + real bibliography built
citeproc-formatted, submission-grade — not a list of links.
Journal styles · LaTeX partial LaTeX soon
APA 7, MLA, Chicago, IEEE, Vancouver. Overleaf export on the roadmap.
Integrity, by design

Juno makes your research more rigorous. It doesn’t fake it — and it never hides that you used it.

Conservative verdicts — biased toward “unverifiable” over a false “supported.”
Export an AI-assistance log — a provenance record of what the AI did, to hand to a committee.
Juno will never help disguise AI use. That’s permanently out of scope.
assistance-log.md built · for your committee
Summary12 sources cited · 0 fabricated · 11 verified · 1 unverifiable.
15:10Citation Auditor — audit report.
15:44Peer Review — reviewer report + Editor’s Decision.
09:02Citation Check — citation report.
See peer review in action
Pricing

Start free. Upgrade when the rigor pays for itself.

Every plan includes the honest citation workflow — the no-fabrication discipline, reference verification, and citation checks. The forensic Citation Auditor and Peer Review, which weigh each claim against its cited source, come with Membership + Scholar — and are included in the Student plan.

Free
  • 1 project
  • Idea, Outline & Writer agents
Start free
Student
For students, teachers & academics
  • All agents, incl. Scholar
  • .edu email required
Get Student
Membership
  • All agents + Deep Research + voice
  • Unlimited projects
Get Membership

Developer? BYOK — bring your own API key, unlimited usage. Start with BYOK →

Scholarly Mode

Drop in a draft. See what holds up.

No fabricated citations. Every source checked against the claim it supports.